Author: mrclawster

Survey: Formatting Rules

Among benchmarking concerns, librarian smackdowns, and fines for hallucinations, I fear I sometimes fail to take advantage of ‘good enough’ solutions. I share this internal tool to demonstrate why perfect doesn’t have to be the enemy of good. Need: We use our client’s templates as a model for desired formatting but we also like to […]

Research Memo: Hallucinated Cases

Issue: Numerous legal pros have been eager to point out that citing to hallucinated case law is NOT technical incompetence. It’s a failure to read the cases. So, we have a violation of other ethical rules; duty of candor, for example. What then, might a violation of the duty of tech competence actually look like? Summary […]

Vibe Check Viz

It’s possible to register a client’s trademark even where there are numerous other, similar marks. The mark might ‘create a unique commercial impression’ for purposes of trademark law. Trademark law protects the public from confusingly similar marks but it doesn’t prevent the proliferation of trite branding. In this simple visualization, we started with a search […]

Clio Draft Pleading Starter

Pleading starters are a good way to get started in document automation. These templates simply generate the caption and signature block, allowing you to jump right into the substantive portion of your document. The attached template demonstrates some basic concepts for building one of these. It can be downloaded and edited for a firm’s personal […]

Research Memo: Ethical Pricing on Automations

My document automation tool saves me loads of time. Can I still charge my regular flat fee? But is it ethical? This question is sure to follow any presentation relating to the value of legal tech. It’s especially common in conversations about document automation. For example, if I can reduce the time it takes me […]